1927 U.S. Supreme Court case of Buck v. Bell Research Paper

1927 U.S. Supreme mash case of institutionalise v. Bell - search Paper ExampleBuck, although was not a mentally retarded became a victim of conspiracy by her lawyer who colluded with the state by merely contend procedural impropriety of Virginia law. The U.S. Supreme Court merely upheld the law as compliant of fourteenth amendment without going through the mistake of fact that Buck was a mentally retarded person. Ever since, many states have enacted promptly and many have since repealed them though after decades of injustice to the forcibly sterilized victims. The genetic pre-disposition is a debatable issue and without any conclusive evidence, it is disastrous to forcibly sterilize the hapless and vulnerable persons in prisons and asylums only. What happened to eugenics, particularly enforced sterilization, in the years side by side(p) the Supreme Courts findings in the Buck v. Bell case? What is the current legal status of enforced sterilization in the U.S.? Buck v Bell (1927) case was wrong if viewed from the angle of mistake of fact (Larson, 2012, p. 128) but justified within the perspectives of Eugenics. It was a mistake of fact because Buck was not mentally retarded nor had a promiscuous life. Her own foster parents relatives had raped her resulting in her giving birth to a mentally retarded child which died at the be on of eight. ... It is a scientific fact that mental illnesses can be due to genetic predisposition of individuals concerned meaning that these diseases are hereditary in character capable of being passed on to future generations or off-springs of an affected individual. Thus, the well-meant laws of state legislature could not but be upheld by the Supreme Court in deference to the wishes of the legislators. Virginias eugenic laws were defended by both conservatives and progressives. Republicans, Democrats, lay citizens, Christians and Jews also supported the bills. Supreme Court only upheld the popular will of States concerned. The not ions of akin breeds like and public policy considerations advocated in Platos Republic and the idea of encouraging best humans to reproduce were overwhelming as well (Larson, 2012, pp. 120-121). The Buck decision came in 1927 and by 1937 thirty two states had enacted compulsory sterilization laws and five more could manage sterilizations without passing laws to that effect. Merits of eugenics notwithstanding, the Supreme Court was placed with existent mistakes concerning the victim Buck and it therefore upheld the law as having complied with due process requirement that was the only dispute at issue consequent to 14th Amendment (Larson, 2012, p. 124). It is sort of ironical that Supreme Court did not think it fit to hold the view that criminal behavior was inheritable and hence ruled against sterilization proposals for trey times repeat offenders in the year 1942 while deciding in Skinner v. Oklahoma (1942). As such, the Supreme Court has not overruled Buck so far. Skinner was o verturned for reasons of sterilization as a punishment rather than