Motivation as central to successful management Essay

indigence as central to successful management - Essay ExampleLogically then, when utilizing qualitative methods, a guesswork is not required prior to the selective information gathering phase as the query worker reaches their conclusions as the information is being collected.Quantitative enquiry, on the other hand, is more involved with the gathering of falsifiable data, numbers and statistics. As quantitative analysis is more concrete in nature, as it deals with figures as opposed to words which cig atomic number 18t be interpreted, quantitative analysis is perceived to be more logical in nature. Also, when using this method, the seeker is generally categorized as an impartial observer as opposed to an active participant. Logically, with quantitative research the basic premise of the research needs to be defined prior to the data collection. Therefore, a supposal needs to be established prior to the commencement of data collection (The qualitative, 2006).Due to the empirica l foundations of quantitative research many people feel that it is more scientific in nature and at that placefore better however, this is not necessarily true. The main determinant in arriving upon a research methodology is the type of data collection method that best achieves the goals of the researcher. Each type has an appropriate use and more frequently researchers are combining the two techniques in order to gain better insight into the research topic. For the purpose of this research undertaking, however, it was narrow downd that a qualitative approach better accommodate the aims and objectives to be achieved, in order to determine if motivation is central to successful managementTypes of Qualitative Research MethodsUpon determining that qualitative research was the best-loved method of research, the author needed to research the several methodologies available and select the one best suited to enable the author to research and analyse the effect of motivation on successf ul management. In the hobby paragraphs the various types of qualitative research methods evaluated and the strengths and weaknesses of each are presented and discussed. Secondary Research/Desk Research Secondary research is designed to provide the evaluation of experts which has been reviewed by other experts (Haley, 2003). This type of research, sometimes referred to as desk research, involves systematically and objectively locating, evaluating, and synthesizing evidence in order to establish facts and draw conclusions concerning a set of events. Rather than collecting data, vicarious data is used, that is, documents that are already in existence, published and unpublished (Britton, 1996, p. 1). The use of petty(a) research allows for the analysis of a broad range of topics that can be thoroughly investigated and has proven to be credible. In addition, there are time limitations that may inhibit the ability of the researcher to conduct primitive research and secondary research allows for analysis of a great amount of data in minimal time. According to Haley (2003) many researchers have opted to conduct secondary research as opposed to primary research. Procter (1993) asserts that more generally, limited opportunities for conducting primary research