The U.S. Education System and Adolescent Students At-Risk Essays

The U.S. rearing formation and Adolescent Students At-RiskIn an age where getting a good tuition is increasingly a predictor of future success and stability, many of our youthfulness be at-risk of falling behind in classes and push asideping out of uplifted school. Approximately half of all American adolescents engage in activities that impute them at-risk and endanger their ability to succeed (Lingren, 1997). Not all of these adolescents will drop out of high school or end up on the streets, but a substantial number of them will not contribute their potential in school and may carry feelings of failure with them the detain of their lives. Adolescents spend approximately seven hours a day, five days a week, in middle and high schools, making schools a logical daub where at-risk adolescents might receive help. Realizing that this is a crucial time in their development, educators control instituted numerous school programs targeting these adolescents to help them succeed an d catch-up to their peers. This paper will revolve around on adolescents who are at-risk educationally, and what strategies have proven effective at preventing dropouts and serving them catch up to normal levels for their grade. It will examine theories about how adolescents execute at-risk, the needs of these students, several models of intervention, and overall characteristics of successful programs. Although most definitions of at-risk include individuals with mischievous learning disabilities and the mentally handicapped, this paper will focus primarily on students who appear to have the capacity to catch up to their grade level, and who are at-risk because of behaviors, environmental factors, or because they were not given meaningful instruction at an early age. Some observers estimate that ... ...mpscott, Massachusetts Watersun Publishing Company, Inc.17.Sanders, M. G. (2000). Schooling Students dictated At Risk Research, Policy, and Practice in the Educa tion of Poor and nonage Adolescents. Mahwah, New Jersey Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.18.Slavin, R. E., Karweit, N. L., & Madden, N. A. (1989). Effective Programs for Students At Risk. Boston, Massachusetts Allyn & Bacon.19.U.S. Department of Education (2003). Electronic source Official U.S. Dept. of Education website http//www.nochildleftbehind.gov/20.Washington, V. (1995). Project Head capture Models and Strategies for the Twenty- First Century. New York, New York Garland Publishing, Inc.21.Wehlage, G. G. et al. (1989). Reducing the Risk Schools as Communities of Support. Philadelphia Falmer Press